On 3/12/24 11:40, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
I'm interested what independent mailman-users@ think on technical issues of DKIM/SPF, but `advice' from fined monopolist google Not wanted.
Search RISKS archives around the time SPF was introduced, that's about the earliest discussion I know of.
Non-technically it's snake oil, obviously: nothing is stopping me from buying a domain (in "national alphabets", too, so there's no shortage of names) using a stolen credit card number, "protect it" so noting comes up in whois, add all the DMARC/DKIM/SPF records imaginable, and start spamming like there is no tomorrow. Once it's blacklisted by everyone: ditch it and buy another. Rinse, lather, repeat.
It's only stopping the small mom-and-pop spammers. And mailman users. Dima ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/ Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/ https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
