Hey, Philip!

On 8 Feb 2016, at 13:56, Philip Paeps wrote:

On 2016-02-08 11:14:09 (+0100), Vlad Ghitulescu <[email protected]> wrote:
On 8 Feb 2016, at 10:49, Philip Paeps wrote:
My archives go back to the mid-nineties. Since mail (generally) compresses well and (server) disk space kept getting cheaper, I decided a very long time ago that it's cheaper to keep everything than to regularly evaluate what's relevant.

How often do you use / read those mid-nineties email messages now?

Surprisingly often!

I'm then a lot luckier: My archives grows bigger every year, but I rarely (**very** rarely) search something older than three years.


Well, maybe not those from the nineties.

This is the chance to let them go! ;-)

(…)


Simple connectivity is one thing, but also finding what I need.

See my previous message: MailSteward or HoudahSpot make that realy easy.

I hadn't heard of these until now.

MailSteward (http://www.mailsteward.com) worked just fine with Mail.app for me - unfortunately not with MailMate, so I had to search for an alternative. It makes a MySQL-database from the email messages and let you search via an interface but also via *raw* sql-query if this strikes your fancy. It can schedule archiving, support OS X tags etc.

HoudahSpot (https://www.houdah.com/houdahSpot/) uses Spotlight's indexing for search, but it's a lot more powerful and convenient than using Spotlight. I'm using this to search the archived email messages from MailMate (they are eml-files in a Finder-folder). That's as quick as MailSteward but let my email messages free from any proprietary format (even if the eml-files - and their attributes - are generated by MailMate while dragging them from MailMate into the Finder-folder). And I'm using HoudahSpot already for searching & finding anything on my iMac, so there is no supplementary effort involved :-)


I'm not terribly enthusiastic about spreading my email access across different systems though.

That's a valid point!
But I think that Spotlight (w/o the confort of HoudahSpot) is secure enough, don't you think?


Standardised IMAP "just works". Even if it means dragging a lot of history around and stretching client data structures and indices to their limits. :)

:-D
I can see the challenge, yes! Scaling is hard!

Thanks again for your thoughts!


Philip

--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information

Vlad
_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate

Reply via email to