You assume too much, you assume most people will rely upon a third
party, fact is, most dont :)
I was sent this last year when this tired old excuse came out for the
umpteenth time :
<snip IRC>
<Tariq> out of 1419728 active mail accounts, I see 36 forwards, we not
use SPF or DKIM
</snip IRC>
36 outa 1.4 mill, that ratio mimics networks I look after, IOW
joe-average doesnt forward their mail, in fact in past couple years
since Snowden we've seen users use their local mail 500 fold over prior
to his revelations.
Next you'll be trying to claim it fails with mailing lists.. though I'm
sure a lot of people over the past 12-15 years or so (I was an early
adopter of SPF) were hoping it would mute me but no such luck for them
;)
On 07/01/2016 12:22, Brandon Long wrote:
> Or, you know, spf failure was considered a complete failure in itself, given
> that mail tends to get forwarded.
--
If you have the urge to reply to all rather than reply to list,
you
best first read http://members.ausics.net/qwerty/
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
