On 16/03/2017 14:18, Kevin Huxham wrote:
they probably sell fax machines.
Their response is a bit like someone sending them credit card details on
a postcard, and them tearing it up (because you shouldn't send
confidential information on postcards) and asking the sender to send the
details again, but put them in an envelope next time.
It's totally ignoring the fact that it's too late by then... (and the
fact that the envelope will be opened by the mail boy (Google in this
case) so the confidential information will still be visible by
unspecified eyes after arrival).
-K
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:50 AM, Brandon Long via mailop
<mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote:
That's a custom rejection message set by that GSuite customer, no
clue what policy they set.
Brandon
On Mar 15, 2017 9:35 PM, "Seth Mattinen" <se...@rollernet.us
<mailto:se...@rollernet.us>> wrote:
Here's one I'm hoping someone can tell me I'm missing
something obvious: Google is rejecting a TLS connection with
an error saying to use TLS, but the connection is indeed using
TLS.
2017-03-15T21:03:15.960985-07:00 smtpauth postfix/smtp[14716]:
Trusted TLS connection established to aspmx.l.google.com
<http://aspmx.l.google.com>[2607:f8b0:400e:c06::1a]:25:
TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)
2017-03-15T21:03:17.241821-07:00 smtpauth postfix/smtp[14716]:
E6AB62800049: to=<x...@x.net>, relay=aspmx.l.google.com
<http://aspmx.l.google.com>[2607:f8b0:400e:c06::1a]:25,
delay=5.3, delays=3.1/0/0.93/1.2, dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced
(host aspmx.l.google.com
<http://aspmx.l.google.com>[2607:f8b0:400e:c06::1a] said:
550-5.7.1 Your email has been rejected because it violates X X
550-5.7.1 security policy. Potential sensitive data was found
in the email 550-5.7.1 and/or attachment and your email server
does not support TLS 550-5.7.1 encryption. Please use and
alternate method of delivery such as fax 550 5.7.1 or a
different email provider that supports TLS. - gcdp X.124 -
gsmtp (in reply to end of DATA command))
What am I missing other than the suggested fax?
~Seth
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
<https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop>
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
<https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop>
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
