Hi Stefano,

WatchGuard (http://reputationauthority.org/) are starting to not like the
IP also - "The ip 188.165.188.38 has sent a high ratio of spam (50
percent)."

My guess is that you are seeing the beginning of a reputation problem
developing with your IP. It's not restaurant menu that's causing the
problem. 

Ken.

-- 
Ken O'Driscoll / We Monitor Email
t: +353 1 254 9400 | w: www.wemonitoremail.com

On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 14:42 +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> On 19 May 2017 at 13:28, Ken O'Driscoll <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Stefano,
> > 
> > That link is only intended for customers. Try using the IP address
> > removal
> > portal at http://ipremoval.sms.symantec.com/lookup/ to request that
> > your IP
> > be de-listed. They will de-list a false positive or tell you what is
> > actually causing the issue. All of their services still share the same
> > reputation data as far as I know.
> 
> I should have written that I already tested all of my IPs at that page
> and they are not listed.
> 
> > The IP address you submitted, 188.165.188.38, does not have a negative
> reputation and therefore cannot be submitted for investigation.
> 
> > The alternative is to find a Symantec customer who is affected and get
> > them
> > to open a service request listing you as an available contact point for
> > troubleshooting. All Symantec products and services come with basic
> > support
> > cover which allows this.
> 
> That's what I will do.. but this is a "menu" email from a restaurant to a
> lenovo address (nearby office).. the recipient subscribed to receive the
> menu (sent to other 60 people, 2 in lenovo), but I'm not sure he cares
> enough to open a ticket with his manager at lenovo dealings with the
> symanteccloud configuration. So for my customer it's a fault or mine. I
> hoped I was able to get some sort of hint from symantec or anyone else
> already seen that Message filtered block from symantec when the IP was
> not blocked.
> The same happened to another customer with a vodafone.com address
> (different IP, similar story).
> 
> Thank you,
> Stefano
>  
> >  
> > 
> > Ken.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ken O'Driscoll / We Monitor Email
> > t: +353 1 254 9400 | w: www.wemonitoremail.com
> > 
> > On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 12:56 +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > i'm seeing some reject like this by some of our senders:
> > >
> > > > 553 Message filtered. Refer to the Troubleshooting page at 
> > > > http://www.symanteccloud.com/troubleshooting for more information.
> > > (#5.7.1)
> > >
> > > The landing page explanation for the message filtered brings on the
> > table
> > > almost anything (blacklist ip, open relay, duns, urls, mail server
> > > configuration, virus, exploit, opt-out link).
> > >
> > > So the answer is no to everything. If one of my customer spammed
> > Symantec
> > > customers I'd like to identify him.
> > >
> > > I was about to submit the "False positive" here:
> > > https://support.symantec.com/en_US/article.TECH233678.html
> > >
> > > But from the description it's not clear to me if this is only for
> > their
> > > customers or not.
> > >
> > > Is there anyone from Symantec here?
> > > Does anyone have experience with this generic message filtered error
> > and
> > > how to deal with it?
> > >
> > > Stefano
> > >
> > > --
> > > Stefano Bagnara
> > > Void Labs / VOXmail.it
> > > Apache James/jSPF/jDKIM
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mailop mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > mailop mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to