On 6 November 2017 at 19:21, Steve Atkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 6, 2017, at 10:15 AM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> In article 
>> <caggejxymjtzeagypjw_uni5n-qgpvtjbtn6tvzpkghirhzr...@mail.gmail.com> you 
>> write:
>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>>>
>>> All other members, you might want to check this out and make sure
>>> you're comfortable with your messages being published on the web in
>>> this manner.
>>
>> It's rather rude to make an archive without asking permission, but
>> given that anyone can subscribe to this list and look at the regular
>> archive, I hope everyone has been assuming all along that nothing
>> here is very private.
>
> It's more an issue of "indexed by Google"[1] than anything else, I think.

Yes, I personally wrote IPs and domains because I "knew" they where
private to this list. Anyone that joined this list can READ them, but
list members cannot redistribute or disclose contents directed to the
list to anyone else without the consent of the author (at least in
Europe). At most they can tell people to join this list.

When I subscribed to mailop I didn't understand it was a "public" list
(implicitly deduced by the "The current archive is only available to
the list members." sentence here:
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop ).

I have no issues with public archives (my name on mail-archive report
more than 10.000 messages :-) ) but I personally think this list will
better serve members if we know there are no public archives
(permanent indexed by search engines).

Stefano

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to