Hi Michael,
At 12:20 PM 24-01-2018, Michael Wise via mailop wrote:
Hack: an in-elegant solution that one personally doesn't like, but
that appears to work.
As to the retry interval, I feel a bit out of my depth on that one,
and I guess it all depends on exactly WHY the 452 was thrown, but
... the implication seems to be that an immediate retry (maybe give
it a few seconds?) would be the preferred way to handle it, maybe
with some sort of exponential back-off?
The "immediate retry" could be read as "immediate". From a
receiver's perspective, that does not sound like a good idea. Why
would the receiver's implementation require segmented delivery?
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
