I gather that there are technical reasons, and I think I understand them all (per country/region partition of mailboxes and such), but am not certain.
Again, it's a hack; I'm not happy with it personally, but that's the way it apparently was designed, and that for cause. Huge mail systems frequently don't work the way we normal mortals would intuitively expect them to. I gather it's now being discussed in some depth if there's not a better way of doing this, but it's not my call. Suffice it to say the complaint has been heard. Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? -----Original Message----- From: SM [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 12:39 PM To: Michael Wise <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [mailop] Issues delivering to Hotmail addresses Hi Michael, At 12:20 PM 24-01-2018, Michael Wise via mailop wrote: >Hack: an in-elegant solution that one personally doesn't like, but that >appears to work. > >As to the retry interval, I feel a bit out of my depth on that one, and >I guess it all depends on exactly WHY the 452 was thrown, but ... the >implication seems to be that an immediate retry (maybe give it a few >seconds?) would be the preferred way to handle it, maybe with some sort >of exponential back-off? The "immediate retry" could be read as "immediate". From a receiver's perspective, that does not sound like a good idea. Why would the receiver's implementation require segmented delivery? Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
