Another example of using a 4XX, is if you find a message that your heuristics 'think' is bad, it can register the activity and compare it to activity seen from other connections, and if you don't see a 'pattern' of activity that confirms it, you can adjust the heuristics to allow it through, but if the 'pattern' of activity confirms the suspicions, can adjust the heuristics to send 5XX for any retries..

aka his example in item 3..

I expect that will be more common in the future..

So, if you see a 4XX and then later a 5XX for the same message, you can assume there is a problem.. If you get a 4XX and later it delivers, you are good to go..

On 2018-11-22 7:40 a.m., Vladimir Dubrovin via mailop wrote:

I can't say for freenet.de, and I doubt somebody will explain his antispam tactics in details, but generally using 4xx like this is very common.

1. Graylist filter checks if you re-send the same message, because many spammers don't even try.
2. It may be result of ratelimiting, message above ratelimit may get 4xx
3. It may be attempt to detect the suspicious mass-mailing. Some logic in antispam detects new template or some rule marks message as suspicious and delays it to understand if it was a single message or is a part of mass-mailing campaign. A single message later may be allowed to pass. 4. "Same" (according to e.g. ML or some unreliable heuristics) messages were marked as spam by users and are awaiting for additional analysis or manual rules/actions. 5. There are some temp failures e.g. DNS timeouts on name resolutions for MX / PTR / SPF / etc and/or reputation data is insufficient

and lot more. Just do the things as you expected to and implement reasonable retry strategy.


15.11.2018 15:25, Stefan Bauer пишет:
freenet.de rejecting with 451 that should be a perm error (suspicious message)

Hi,


we just noticed that freenet.de is reject some of our mails with


451 Suspicious message, please come back later (in reply to end of DATA command)


That makes no sense to us. If mail looks fishy to freenet, they should generate a perm. error (5xx) and not let us try over and over again.


Can anyone from freenet please clarify?


Thank you.


Stefan



_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop


--
Vladimir Dubrovin
@Mail.Ru


_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop




--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to