Il 12 ottobre 2019 01:31 Brandon Long via mailop <[email protected]> ha scritto:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:09 AM Chris Woods via mailop < [email protected]> wrote:Has the prevailing method of deciding worthiness now become permanently biased towards the 'prior reputation' factor?
I think it's been that way for a long time, unfortunately. Different systems have different memories, I know we try and not have a long memory... but unfortunately, "forgetting" requires disuse for our system, so a low volume of continued use won't help us forget... the mail has to be actually marked as non-spam by our users in that case. I think that is a problem with our system, but it's a hard one to solve ... or hasn't been that important to solve.
If I may, I think you (you Google, not you personally) should think again at how important it is to allow small legitimate senders to deliver reliably to you. Last week I was in a policy meeting in Europe with pretty high level people, and we were debating the centralizing effects of DNS-over-HTTPS and its implementation by browsers, and by the first five minutes someone said "oh but it's nothing new, Google wants to centralize everything in their hands, see how they force everyone to use Gmail by rejecting valid email from small independent servers, using spam as an excuse". True or not, in policy circles this has become one of the main supporting facts for the idea that Google plans to conquer the world by using its size to kill everyone else. So it would do good to you, and not just to the entire Internet, if you found ways to treat small sending systems better.
--
Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
[email protected]
Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
