On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:14:59 +0000, Steven Champeon via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
>We recently refused mail from a potential licensee because their own >Forefront server labeled it as spam. Authenticated, outbound, and so on, >and they still thought it was worthy of rejecting, so we rejected it (I >still don't quite understand why once a message has been determined to >be spam it is still relayed - but I don't have that many X-headers to >draw on). Outgoing mail has the same filter set applied to it as incoming mail. If an item earns a spammy score, it is marked as such and normally sent out a "high risk" IP pool. It is occasionally necessary to track down false positives, and: > Is there anything at all about these headers that has value? They have value in that they give information that can be useful in troubleshooting. Disclaimer: I left my office, down the hall from Michael's, a litte over five years ago. Just before they moved everybody out of offices and into the newly-faddish "open plan" workplace hell. mdr -- If Jurassic Park had been about email, Jeff Goldblum would be known for saying "Spammers, uh, find a way". -- David Carriger of Infusionsoft, after noting that some spammers they hosed off the deck had found a new home elsewhere. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop