Dnia 24.01.2020 o godz. 10:59:53 Gregory Heytings via mailop pisze: > > That's your opinion. My opinion is that "-all" is almost never a > good idea, and is certainly not a good idea for a small personal > server. It breaks forwards and mailing lists. "?all" does not mean > "we're not sure what we're doing yet" (that would be "+all"), it > means "if none of the previous policy rules matched, do not > interpret this negatively". I agree that "~all" is sometimes > better, but again it tends to break forwards and mailing lists.
+1 :) In my opinion, "-all" is good only when it is the *only* entry in the SPF record, ie. SPF record indicates that the domain does not send mail *at all*. In all other cases, I think that even if original SPF record specifies "-all", the receiving server should override this and interpret it as "?all". -- Regards, Jaroslaw Rafa r...@rafa.eu.org -- "In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub." _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
