* Matt Corallo via mailop: > The goal isn't to sign emails, in fact ideally we wouldn't have to at > all. The goal is only to get the deliveability advantages of DKIM > *without* signing (or at least without non-reputably signing) email.
I'm struggling with your stated goal. If you don't DKIM-sign outbound messages, you won't have "advantages", as you put it. If you do sign your messages but the verification fails, there won't be advantages either. Only if the DKIM signature verification succeeds, the receiving party may (!) count this in your favour, but you cannot influence what happens at the recipient's end beyond creating a proper DKIM signature. -Ralph _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
