In article <f0d77128-b3d3-eff9-f50e-b6e81b495...@tana.it> you write:
>On Sun 06/Dec/2020 16:32:13 +0100 Mary via mailop wrote:
>> (but I don't agree with point 2. by Paul, I aggressively block SPF fails, 
>> even soft errors. If a company doesn't fix their SPF records
>then I reject all their mail)

Don't your users complain about all of the mail they're missing? The
false positive rate if you block on soft SPF fails is gigantic.

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to