In article <f0d77128-b3d3-eff9-f50e-b6e81b495...@tana.it> you write: >On Sun 06/Dec/2020 16:32:13 +0100 Mary via mailop wrote: >> (but I don't agree with point 2. by Paul, I aggressively block SPF fails, >> even soft errors. If a company doesn't fix their SPF records >then I reject all their mail)
Don't your users complain about all of the mail they're missing? The false positive rate if you block on soft SPF fails is gigantic. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop