Heho, On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 17:53 -0500, John R Levine wrote: > > dmarcv1 is a typo in the description (i correctly check for DMARC1, > > otherwise this would have shown up earlier); > ?? > er... DKIMv1... -.-' The check checks for v=DMARC1, not DKIMv1 as the description implies; Currently fixing that.
> It's in RFC 9091 and in the DMARC update currently in draft form at > the IETF. The intention was always that you could put private > clauses in DMARC records which get ignored by clients that don't > understand them, but the ABNF was overly clever. That's fixed in the > new draft too. Will fix that part asap/tonight; Will let you know if it should behave better. With best regards, Tobias _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
