Once upon a time, Mike Hillyer <[email protected]> said: > You get a doordash status message, you decide you don't need them, you > unsubscribe. A couple of months later you need to reset your password and now > you never get the reset link because you unsubscribed from transactional > messages? Sure, we can get infinitely granular or always exempt password > resets, but it becomes a slippery slope that results in a lot of engineering > hours.
Not spamming people does sometimes require more work. And I believe this kind of stuff is exactly the definition of spam: UCE. There is no doubt that it is unsolicited, no doubt that it is commercial. Why should it get a pass? "Because it's hard" is no more of an excuse for this than any other type of spam. So yeah, password resets and/or email resets could still go (although still a "not me" link should at least signal somebody that "something is wrong"), but everything else should follow at minimum an opt-out system, if not opt-in. -- Chris Adams <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
