Indeed, you are correct -- according to section 3.2.3 in RFC 5322,
the at ("@") symbol counts as a "special" character that's
categorized seprarately from "atext," and an example in Appendix A
demonstrates quoting when a special character is present:
RFC 5322 :: Internet Message Format
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5322#section-3.2.3
Thanks for pointing out my PEBCAK* error -- I somehow got the eMail
address included in the atext Atom of the "From:" field. :D
Sorry about that.
* PEBCAK: Problem Exists Between Chair And Keyboard
> Hi,
>
> recently i see messages from this ML rejected by my MTA, due
> malformed To: header (from [email protected]):
>
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>
> AFAIK, the display name have to be quoted (@ char in it), thus
> my MTA is right, but...
>
> Please, am i too strict with this syntax check or this ML is too
> lax in that (or both)?
>
> regards
>
> --
> Slavko
> https://www.slavino.sk/
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
--
Postmaster - [email protected]
Randolf Richardson, CNA - [email protected]
Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc.
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
https://www.inter-corporate.com/
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
