> > > recently i see messages from this ML rejected by my MTA, due
> > > malformed To: header (from [email protected]):
> > >
> > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>
> Unrelated to the question of whether or not @ merits escaping or quoting...
>
> I personally wouldn't put an email address in the "friendly to" (the
> bit between the To: and <). You will find some providers and spam
> filters will consider that a sign of badness. I ran into this
> personally back on November 30th, though apparently I didn't save the
> NDR so I can't tell you which filter it was. I ended up modifying my
> own mailing list manager to strip email addresses out of the
> "friendly" bit of email headers.
Thanks Al (I think I remember you from NANAE many years ago).
I don't intentionally add @ symbols in the "friendly to" field, but
this time it happened by mistake. I agree with your assessment.
> Cheers,
> Al Iverson
Happy New Year.
> --
>
> Al Iverson / Deliverability: https://www.spamresource.com
> Tools: https://www.wombatmail.com / (312) 725-0130 (Chicago)
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
--
Postmaster - [email protected]
Randolf Richardson, CNA - [email protected]
Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc.
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
https://www.inter-corporate.com/
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
