Well correct me if I’m wrong but to use Proofpoint’s “URLDefense” you have to 
be on their cloud in some way, and the reason I made it protocol aware was 
because then it doesn’t break the original message signatures etc.

Regards,

Michelle

> On 26 Sep 2026, at 16:38, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dnia 26.09.2026 o godz. 14:03:30 Michelle Sullivan via mailop pisze:
>> 
>> https://mailbox.isux.net/_safelink?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scorprox.com%2F&h=5bb6c24a5052b44003aa3f3c49dbd110&a=qM1w5krFliYnSFc59aZ0Be8yXQrBsJt0HBi4VuEsgu0MD41k
> 
> Ah, so it doesn't work on SMTP side - doesn't rewrite links in messages when
> they arrive to your mailbox, like for example Proofpoint's "URLDefense" does
> - but processes the IMAP/POP3 client's connection and rewrites links on the
> fly as the client retrieves the messages.
> 
> Maybe it's only me, but I see marginal usage for this tool. There are many
> other ways to access email messages residing on the server than IMAP/POP3.
> Webmail systems can directly access the messages on server, bypassing the
> IMAP middleman, as it is more effective, and email clients, especially in
> corporate or mobile environments, can connect to a server using other
> protocols (like MS Exchange/Outlook proprietary protocol, some kind of HTTP
> REST API - especially in mobile applications - or even a SQL database
> connection, in an environment where email server puts messages into a
> database and the client running on employee's desktop retrieves them over
> the corporate network, Lotus Domino style).
> 
> I have the impression that usage of IMAP/POP3 is decreasing rapidly.
> Individual, "casual" email users have mostly switched to webmail, mobile and
> corporate users often use the proprietary options mentioned above. My view
> is that IMAP (not speaking of POP3, which seems completely outdated) is
> today used mostly by people who are tech-savvy enough to be aware of
> phishing danger and careful of what they click on. Maybe I'm wrong,
> however...
> 
> Not speaking about the marginal old-school case when someone is reading the
> email directly by ssh-ing to the server and running a console-mode email
> client that accesses directly the message files in Maildirs, which is still
> my preferred way of reading email :)
> -- 
> Regards,
>   Jaroslaw Rafa
>   [email protected]
> --
> "In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
> was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailbox.isux.net/_safelink?u=https%3A%2F%2Flist.mailop.org%2Flistinfo%2Fmailop&h=3b6b9b11943c7ea9e94cda472f10b36e&a=qM1w5krFliYnSFc59aZ0Be8yXQrBsJt0HBi4VuEsgu0MD41k

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to