Already in the coding stage. :) I did think of EWS and RPC/MAPI but both are burdensome and I’d be constantly chasing my tail for them. There is an option planned (for v2) to allow rewriting on entry but it is strictly optional (defaults off) as it will break all forwarding, DKIM/ARC etc.
Regards, Michelle > On 27 Sep 2026, at 12:42, Scott Q. via mailop <[email protected]> wrote: > > Check out JMAP - > https://mailbox.isux.net/_safelink?u=https%3A%2F%2Fjmap.io&h=f9f59666dbe0ac9fea85c835a13908c2&a=MFhPXCQe6KNMMvh_4x7Bf5yiH8ovKMFHDjmGKRCSTd0N7_uK > > > Scott > On Saturday, 26-09-2026 at 02:38 Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote: > > Dnia 26.09.2026 o godz. 14:03:30 Michelle Sullivan via mailop pisze: > > > > https://mailbox.isux.net/_safelink?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scorprox.com&h=8932e726aa845ead2a787d5184d5051a&a=MFhPXCQe6KNMMvh_4x7Bf5yiH8ovKMFHDjmGKRCSTd0N7_uK/ > > Ah, so it doesn't work on SMTP side - doesn't rewrite links in messages when > they arrive to your mailbox, like for example Proofpoint's "URLDefense" does > - but processes the IMAP/POP3 client's connection and rewrites links on the > fly as the client retrieves the messages. > > Maybe it's only me, but I see marginal usage for this tool. There are many > other ways to access email messages residing on the server than IMAP/POP3. > Webmail systems can directly access the messages on server, bypassing the > IMAP middleman, as it is more effective, and email clients, especially in > corporate or mobile environments, can connect to a server using other > protocols (like MS Exchange/Outlook proprietary protocol, some kind of HTTP > REST API - especially in mobile applications - or even a SQL database > connection, in an environment where email server puts messages into a > database and the client running on employee's desktop retrieves them over > the corporate network, Lotus Domino style). > > I have the impression that usage of IMAP/POP3 is decreasing rapidly. > Individual, "casual" email users have mostly switched to webmail, mobile and > corporate users often use the proprietary options mentioned above. My view > is that IMAP (not speaking of POP3, which seems completely outdated) is > today used mostly by people who are tech-savvy enough to be aware of > phishing danger and careful of what they click on. Maybe I'm wrong, > however... > > Not speaking about the marginal old-school case when someone is reading the > email directly by ssh-ing to the server and running a console-mode email > client that accesses directly the message files in Maildirs, which is still > my preferred way of reading email :) > -- > Regards, > Jaroslaw Rafa > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > -- > "In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there > was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub." > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://mailbox.isux.net/_safelink?u=https%3A%2F%2Flist.mailop.org%2Flistinfo%2Fmailop&h=3b6b9b11943c7ea9e94cda472f10b36e&a=MFhPXCQe6KNMMvh_4x7Bf5yiH8ovKMFHDjmGKRCSTd0N7_uK > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://mailbox.isux.net/_safelink?u=https%3A%2F%2Flist.mailop.org%2Flistinfo%2Fmailop&h=3b6b9b11943c7ea9e94cda472f10b36e&a=6daVXBwuq5qFgrEhPwg0EmsSVhARM8s_bDYEqlqQq3yMOA2W
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
