On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Atin Mukherjee <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 7 September 2016, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Just wondering, is it going to be something more than the aggregation of >> BZ descriptions? Do you think it is better to callout just some BZs which >> are user facing compared to the normal aggregation? >> > > IMHO, I don't think users go through all the individual BZs mentioned in > the release note, so having a seperate section in highlighting any major > change w.r.t usability/performance should be explicitly mentioned. > Cool, I think we can add one for compound-fops changes too. > >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Niels de Vos <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Avra, >>> >>> http://review.gluster.org/15308 is one of your patches, and this changes >>> the allocation of ports used. It seems to address a real problem, so it >>> is acceptible to include it in 3.8. >>> >>> Because it is a user facing change (different ports), we need to mention >>> the difference in behaviour in the release notes. Could you provide me >>> with a suitable text that includes the problem being addressed, and how >>> the usage of ports differs from before? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Niels >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> maintainers mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Pranith >> > > > -- > --Atin > -- Pranith
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
