On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:31:24PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > On Wednesday 7 September 2016, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Just wondering, is it going to be something more than the aggregation of > > BZ descriptions? Do you think it is better to callout just some BZs which > > are user facing compared to the normal aggregation? > > > > IMHO, I don't think users go through all the individual BZs mentioned in > the release note, so having a seperate section in highlighting any major > change w.r.t usability/performance should be explicitly mentioned.
Indeed, I do not expect users to read all bugs. The bugs are listed to show the improvements we do, and hopefully help in convincing users to update. Anything that is really user visible, like new options for volumes, change in behaviour or major performance benefits should be called out specifically. Thanks, Niels > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Niels de Vos <[email protected] > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > > >> Hi Avra, > >> > >> http://review.gluster.org/15308 is one of your patches, and this changes > >> the allocation of ports used. It seems to address a real problem, so it > >> is acceptible to include it in 3.8. > >> > >> Because it is a user facing change (different ports), we need to mention > >> the difference in behaviour in the release notes. Could you provide me > >> with a suitable text that includes the problem being addressed, and how > >> the usage of ports differs from before? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Niels > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> maintainers mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Pranith > > > > > -- > --Atin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
