Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi James, > > Am 08.11.2008 um 17:06 schrieb James Lee: >> On 08/11/08, 15:40:29, Dagobert Michelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >> regarding >> Re: [csw-maintainers] Java... again!: >> >>> jdk5-1.5.0_15,REV=2008.11.08-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >>> jdk5-1.5.0_15,REV=2008.11.08-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >>> jdk6-6u7,REV=2008.11.08-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >>> jdk6-6u7,REV=2008.11.08-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> Latest 1.5 is Update 16 >> http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index_jdk5.jsp >> >> The latest 1.6 is Update 10. >> http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp > > I got them from the archive page. Who can imagine > archived versions would be old? Me??? Oh well... > Heres some warmed up Java in > <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/testing.html>: > > jre13-1.3.1_22,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > jre13-1.3.1_22,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > jre14-1.4.2_17,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > jre14-1.4.2_17,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > jre5-1.5.0_16,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > jre5-1.5.0_16,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > jre6-1.6.0_10,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > jre6-1.6.0_10,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > jdk13-1.3.1_22,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > jdk13-1.3.1_22,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > jdk14-1.4.2_17,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > jdk14-1.4.2_17,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > jdk5-1.5.0_16,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > jdk5-1.5.0_16,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > jdk6-1.6.0_10,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > jdk6-1.6.0_10,REV=2008.11.09-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > >> It identifies itself: >> >> $ java -version >> java version "1.6.0_10" >> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_10-b33) >> Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 11.0-b15, mixed mode) >> >> So why use break the pattern of naming, I'd expect the package to be >> identified similarly as "1.6.0_10". > > I should never have followed marketing numbers. The package > now identified itself with the technical version number. > > James, do you mind testing these?
Some comments: * Can the JDKs be installed under /opt/csw/jdk to reduce the /opt/csw clutter. That also more similar to how it is installed under /usr * I like the way Sun does it with their "instances". If my package depend on Java 5 or 6 I would like to default the JDK path to /opt/csw/jdk/instance/jdk1.5.0. $ ls -l /usr/jdk /usr/jdk/instances/ /usr/jdk: total 10 drwxr-xr-x 4 root bin 512 Feb 29 2008 instances lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 18 Nov 5 16:30 jdk1.5.0_16 -> instances/jdk1.5.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 18 Nov 5 16:43 jdk1.6.0_10 -> instances/jdk1.6.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 11 Nov 5 16:43 latest -> jdk1.6.0_10 drwxr-xr-x 7 root bin 512 Nov 5 16:46 packages /usr/jdk/instances/: total 4 drwxr-xr-x 9 root bin 512 Nov 5 16:49 jdk1.5.0 drwxr-xr-x 9 root bin 512 Nov 5 16:51 jdk1.6.0 -- Trygve _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
