On Fri, June 5, 2009 4:39 am, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > Philip Brown wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 06:49:09PM +1200, Chris Reece wrote: >> >>>> * The R*PATH contains /opt/csw/lib twice. It doesn't really hurt to >>>> >>> have >>>> it in there, just for the sake of standardization. >>> >>>> /opt/csw/bin# dump -Lv glocate | grep R*PATH >>>> [5] RUNPATH >>>> >>> /opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST:/opt/csw/lib:/opt/csw/lib >>> >>>> [6] RPATH >>>> >>> /opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST:/opt/csw/lib:/opt/csw/lib >>> >> >> having both RUNPATH and RPATH in there is normal, for some reason. dont >> worry about it. > > IIRC RPATH had been used in the past, but was considered evil as it had > priority over LD_LIBRARY_PATH and you could not override it. That's why > RUNPATH > had been introduced. > > - RPATH (deprecated, not used) > - LD_LIBRARY_PATH > - RUNPATH > - crle settings > > > I would suppose RPATH is still in there for compatibility purposes.
I think we may be talking at crossed purposes. I was under the impression that you were commenting on the duplication of "/opt/csw/lib". I was saying that this appears to be down to my following the documented OpenCSW standards. I may be wrong. No matter, there are new pacakges: /home/testing/findutils-4.4.2,REV=2009.06.08-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz /home/testing/findutils-4.4.2,REV=2009.06.08-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Which are both more up to date (4.4.2 was released in the interim) and should address the points raised. Cheers, Chris. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
