Chris Reece wrote: > On Fri, June 5, 2009 4:39 am, Sebastian Kayser wrote: >> Philip Brown wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 06:49:09PM +1200, Chris Reece wrote: >>> >>>>> * The R*PATH contains /opt/csw/lib twice. It doesn't really hurt to >>>>> >>>> have >>>>> it in there, just for the sake of standardization. >>>>> /opt/csw/bin# dump -Lv glocate | grep R*PATH >>>>> [5] RUNPATH >>>>> >>>> /opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST:/opt/csw/lib:/opt/csw/lib >>>> >>>>> [6] RPATH >>>>> >>>> /opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST:/opt/csw/lib:/opt/csw/lib >>>> >>> having both RUNPATH and RPATH in there is normal, for some reason. dont >>> worry about it. >> IIRC RPATH had been used in the past, but was considered evil as it had >> priority over LD_LIBRARY_PATH and you could not override it. That's why >> RUNPATH >> had been introduced. >> >> - RPATH (deprecated, not used) >> - LD_LIBRARY_PATH >> - RUNPATH >> - crle settings >> >> >> I would suppose RPATH is still in there for compatibility purposes. > > I think we may be talking at crossed purposes. I was under the impression > that you were commenting on the duplication of "/opt/csw/lib". I was saying > that this appears to be down to my following the documented OpenCSW standards. > I may be wrong.
Sorry Chris for getting you confused here. I was indeed only after the duplicate /opt/csw/lib when commenting on your package (and that is what needs to be taken care of). The RPATH/RUNPATH thingie was just in response to Phil's mail. Sebastian _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
