Hi,
Am 31.07.2009 um 18:47 schrieb Philip Brown:
If there were a simplified published API, for the source tree, that
would
accept and interface build systems other than gar, then perhaps
Peter F
(and "others" *cough*) would be more inclined to check their stuff
into it.
for example, if there were a flat namespace in the source tree, and
if it
were always possible to do
cd mgar/pkg/softwarename
#and then one or more of
make
make package
(?make clean?)
Define an absolute top-level "API" that doesnt require GAR, and you
might
see more stuff in there, even from the "GAR-o-phobes"
Right now, you have sort of a defacto one from GAR usage. But you
havent
formally stated, "as long as you follow [this API], its ok even if
you're
not using gar]"
I like this approach - it is simple. We are talking about the packages
of
three maintainers here. Phil, Peter, James: Would you be willing to
commit
your recipes to the repository with these three entry points?
From there we can go forward.
Best regards
-- Dago
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
