Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Mon Aug 03 15:06:16 -0400 2009:
> I like this approach - it is simple. We are talking about the > packages of three maintainers here. Phil, Peter, James: Would you be > willing to commit your recipes to the repository with these three > entry points? ...I've thought about this more over the weekend and I think that it is important that the standard trunk/branches/tags convention be maintained even for things not using GAR. Maybe a script in the 'top level' for each package named 'build' that can be any executable (either driving the make, or running whatever scripted steps are desirable as per James' comments) that had as the only requirement the final production of package files (no patch/build/package intermediates...no args). Sticking to svn best practices will make it easier in the future if it's ever wanted/needed to move from svn to something else. No intermediate steps makes it much easier for everyone to wrap up what already exists for their non-GAR packaging. What do people think of this? [Specifically those not using GAR...] -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
