"Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Peter FELECAN<[email protected]> wrote: >> "Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Peter FELECAN<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> "Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski" <[email protected]> writes:
>>> The GAR packages will be the main focus now, since they comprise about >>> 91% builds (that I know of, that is, ~1083 out of ~1186). Once we're >>> there, we can extend support to other build sources. Of course, it >>> would make it easier to implement if a code repository was available >>> to buildbot. >> >> Are you sure for the figures above? > > Do you want to argue about the figures? :-) > > I counted the packages I knew about: the number of subdirectories in > mgar/pkg, plus mgar/pkg/cpan, plus number of packages listed on your > maitainer page. Feel free to offer better figures! :-) Of course I'm arguing about the figures: as Dag said there are at least 3 maintainers not using gar --- IMHO there are more than that. The total number of packages in the unstable i386 5.8 catalog is 2052. The number of the presumed 3 non gar maintainers packages is 331. This doesn't match your numbers but I invite you to argue on the contrary. Anyhow, the proportion is roughly 1 in 7, 16% of the packages are not gar built. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
