Peter Bonivart <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Maciej (Matchek) > Blizinski<[email protected]> wrote: >> Going back to the topic of buildbot, I think there's consensus that we >> can and should have a common interface to package builds. I've updated >> the draft document at http://wiki.opencsw.org/buildbot to reflect >> that. > > I doubt that defining an API for non-GAR is going to make any > difference. Those not using GAR probably does so because they have > invested heavily in their own methods of doing stuff. The problem is > probably not GAR itself but getting them to do extra work when their > current method works. If they could/wanted to spend time doing > something different I think they could convert directly to GAR > instead. This is based on what I thought before starting to use GAR > myself and also why I still have one package not converted.
This contains a great part of the truth. Although I wouldn't advance my self to give a proportion... I doctor numbers at most once a month... -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
