On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Sebastian Kayser <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was just about to file the bugs against packages which don't have the > py_ prefix. Just wanted to make sure we have reached a consensus here so > that i file the bugs against the right set of packages: > > - python programs with a recognized name can/should be left as is > - python libraries will be prefixed with py_ > > Resuming the pyyaml example: pyyaml is a library (python modules only), > thus the software name would be py_yaml. This is similar to Debian's > policy [1], just that they prefix module packages with "python-". In > their case, pyyaml is packaged as python-yaml [2]. >
except that "pyyaml" is in the "recognized name so should be left as is" category :-) it is "recognized" both in the sense that we have an existing package, AND, even MORE importantly, there is the actual specific name of the software. hosted from "pyyaml.org" _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
