2009/9/25 Trygve Laugstøl <[email protected]>: > Ben Walton wrote: >> Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Thu Sep 24 17:38:12 -0400 2009: >>> So how about >>> 1) If it's a pure module, py_<modulename>. >>> 2) If it's main use is as application, <upstreamname>. >>> 3) In case of doubt, cross-check with other distributions?. >> >> Logical and concise. +1. > > Ditto. +1.
There's also the question of pkgnames, is it CSWpyfoo or CSWpy-foo? If one follows the rule that "each _ becomes a -", we sometimes end up with CSWpy-foo and sometimes CSWpyfoo. I wrote down what I thought is the outcome of this policy (except for the point 3). Here's the table: http://wiki.opencsw.org/python-packages-naming Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
