On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > is cleanly separated from the CSW-only packages. If the "-ln" > suffix is consistent may be discussed, in the current naming > scheme "CSWcupslinks" would IMHO be better, but that is another > thing.
I couldn't decide which was better. I had the following ideas: CSWcupsln CSWcupslinks CSWcupslpdcompat CSWcupsusrbin CSWcups-ln CSWcups-links CSWcups-lpdcompat CSWcups-usrbin CSWcupsclientln CSWcupsclientlinks CSWcupsclientlpdcompat CSWcupsclientusrbin CSWcupsclient-ln CSWcupsclient-links CSWcupsclient-lpdcompat CSWcupsclient-usrbin Which one do you like best? Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
