On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> is cleanly separated from the CSW-only packages. If the "-ln"
> suffix is consistent may be discussed, in the current naming
> scheme "CSWcupslinks" would IMHO be better, but that is another
> thing.

I couldn't decide which was better. I had the following ideas:

CSWcupsln
CSWcupslinks
CSWcupslpdcompat
CSWcupsusrbin
CSWcups-ln
CSWcups-links
CSWcups-lpdcompat
CSWcups-usrbin
CSWcupsclientln
CSWcupsclientlinks
CSWcupsclientlpdcompat
CSWcupsclientusrbin
CSWcupsclient-ln
CSWcupsclient-links
CSWcupsclient-lpdcompat
CSWcupsclient-usrbin

Which one do you like best?

Maciej
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Reply via email to