Hi Maciej,
Am 18.11.2009 um 18:57 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Dagobert Michelsen
<[email protected]> wrote:
is cleanly separated from the CSW-only packages. If the "-ln"
suffix is consistent may be discussed, in the current naming
scheme "CSWcupslinks" would IMHO be better, but that is another
thing.
I couldn't decide which was better. I had the following ideas:
CSWcupsln
CSWcupslinks
CSWcupslpdcompat
CSWcupsusrbin
CSWcups-ln
CSWcups-links
CSWcups-lpdcompat
CSWcups-usrbin
CSWcupsclientln
CSWcupsclientlinks
CSWcupsclientlpdcompat
CSWcupsclientusrbin
CSWcupsclient-ln
CSWcupsclient-links
CSWcupsclient-lpdcompat
CSWcupsclient-usrbin
Which one do you like best?
Maybe we should choose a different prefix that makes it clear that we
replace a Solaris system with it. Maybe something like
CSWXcupsclient
which then depends on CSWcupsclient
Best regards
-- Dago
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
