On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Gary Law <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/12/10 Philip Brown <[email protected]>: >> A quick off-the-cuff solution: >> >> We declare that classutils implementations must be backwards >> compatible. If you want to do something incompatible,you must do it in >> a newly named class. >> >> Problem solved? > > Might be if there were no-one out there shipping identically named > utils installing in the same place, who might just go ahead and > upgrade thiers in an incompatible way. But there is. >
no one else (who matters...) is going to be shipping any pkg class utils named "cswxxxx". our namespace is safe. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
