On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 23.02.2010 um 17:40 schrieb Philip Brown: >> >> "If there is softname, softname_FOO, softname_BAR, softname_BAZ, and >> there are not separate mantis categories, you are expected to go file >> bugs for the base name 'softname' " > > And pm_softname and py_softname?
pm_xxx and py_xxxx do not tend to have sub-packages. I am not aware of even one. > >> Even a newbie user should be able to figure that one out as-is. > > It should not replace the package listing. It is an additional page > like /bundles/<bundle>/ which contains information about the package > in general (like how to use it) and links to the packages it contains. > > The information should be quite easily optainable by just looking at the > upstream URL in the info field: same field - same bundle. I do not see a sane, easily maintainable way to do this. If I did, I would add it in. But I dont see one. If you want to spend time in writing up an implementation that easily ties in to our existing processes, feel free. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
