Hi Phil,
Am 24.02.2010 um 21:29 schrieb Philip Brown:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Dagobert Michelsen
<[email protected]> wrote:
Am 23.02.2010 um 17:40 schrieb Philip Brown:
"If there is softname, softname_FOO, softname_BAR, softname_BAZ,
and
there are not separate mantis categories, you are expected to go
file
bugs for the base name 'softname' "
And pm_softname and py_softname?
pm_xxx and py_xxxx do not tend to have sub-packages. I am not aware
of even one.
They may be subpackages of xxx, like for netsnmp or cyrus_imapd. That
means
they are generated in one go from the same set of sources during the
same
build.
Even a newbie user should be able to figure that one out as-is.
It should not replace the package listing. It is an additional page
like /bundles/<bundle>/ which contains information about the package
in general (like how to use it) and links to the packages it
contains.
The information should be quite easily optainable by just looking
at the
upstream URL in the info field: same field - same bundle.
I do not see a sane, easily maintainable way to do this. If I did, I
would add it in. But I dont see one.
If you want to spend time in writing up an implementation that easily
ties in to our existing processes, feel free.
Sebastian: Is there such a concept in Mantis? If yes we can easily
create
the bundles out of the GAR recipes or by using the above described
procedure
for all other packages.
Best regards
-- Dago
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
.:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
