On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Peter Bonivart <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Philip Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> But if the argument is, "lets put it in the existing DESC field", so >> that it goes in the descriptions file, and is thus still searchable >> client-side relatively easily... then thats ok by me. > > That's what I meant and I think that's what Dago meant as well. > > Sample: > > pm_netdns - Net::DNS. Interface to the DNS resolver >
I think we would be better served having it postpended, rather than prepended. Well, i guess it all depends whether people who may view truncated descriptions of our packaged perl modules, would benefit more from english description, or CPAN description. I cant honestly say I know; we might actually need to do a user survey of this. Personally, I think that CPAN ::-:: notation is primarily useful only when you are actually using CPAN. and if you are using CPAN, then you have no need of our description anyway :-} _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
