Hi,
Am 04.03.2010 um 22:08 schrieb Philip Brown:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Philip Brown <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Maciej Blizinski
<[email protected]> wrote:
* roxfiler: minor version upgrade
..
Should this not also depend on CSWlibice?
and CSWlibsm?
Exactly, it shouldn't. If you look at the RPATHs of the binaries, it
uses libraries from Sun.
Which, for the record, and other people's benefits, is not exactly a
bad thing in and of itself.. it's just bad if it also attempts to use
our new gtk, which needs our newer, non-sun X libs.
Exactly. A package should be linked OpenCSW X11 exactly when:
- it relies on features only available in OpenCSW X11
or
- it is linked together with a binary that is linked against
OpenCSW X11
That means if it is standalone application which doesn't require
OpenCSW X11 it is good practice to bind against Sun X11.
Best regrads
-- Dago
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
.:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
