On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Roger Håkansson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2010-03-11 08:56, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I see poppler functions just above the the evince functions on the >>> stack. Our poppler package is two years old. I think that it's a >>> good idea to update it, link evince against it, and try again. >> >> Poppler will require some work. >> > > If you're going to 0.12, yes, but I'll release 0.10.6. > They just recently switched to 0.12 as their stable branch, 0.10 was the > previous one.
I was thinking of 0.12, but we can try evince with 0.10.x too. The problem with poppler 0.12 is that it requires lcms, which needs to be released in 64-bit, but lcms depends on Python, which is not, and will not, in the nearest future, be available in 64-bit. Perhaps we can drop the dependency on Python for the 64-bit version of lcms? Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
