Hi Phil, Am 01.04.2010 um 20:30 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 from me. But it breaks the long-hated NFS-for-all. > > Okay, we know - you dont like this method. > That being said, I would request that we, as a group, and you > particularly as a member of our board, refrain from making further > remarks of this type? > > Okay, you dont like it. But there are still quite a few places that > share out software via NFS. > Or other methods that functional for packaging purposes, effectively > similar to it. > (eg: rsync) > > To talk like this, is to insult our customers' choices. Not a good > thing at the best of times, but when the choice in this particular > case is a perfectly valid one, especially makes us look bad.
Then I would like to request two things: 1. Make clear what we actually support and how we do that. NFS from Solaris 9 to Solaris 10? Only from Solaris 10 to Solaris 10? How are configuration files are handled? RC-Scripts? SMF? etc. 2. At least one maintainer who actually drives things in terms of NFS-sharing-compliance. I am willing to do some courtesy work, but this goes beyond my line. If the big shops want this feature they can provide someone who works on it. Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
