On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Phil, >
*wave* > Then I would like to request two things: > > 1. Make clear what we actually support and how we do that. > NFS from Solaris 9 to Solaris 10? Only from Solaris 10 to > Solaris 10? How are configuration files are handled? > RC-Scripts? SMF? etc. A very sensible request. Thank you for taking things forward constructively :) I agree that we should probably document this sort of thing more. And I am willing to take this "action item" and implement it myself. Hopefully, I will have some time tonight to do it, or wednesday worst case. > 2. At least one maintainer who actually drives things in terms > of NFS-sharing-compliance. I am willing to do some courtesy > work, but this goes beyond my line. If the big shops want this > feature they can provide someone who works on it. It would appear that I am probably the point person on this sort of thing. But I welcome help from other maintainers as well. Or, even other folks. As Secretary, perhaps you might solicit a request for interested parties on the users' list, Dago? For people who currently deploy in "shared read-only /opt" in some capacity, and are interested in making csw packages better in that area? You could mention that this might not actually require maintaining a package, but be more of a tech resource, and "focus group", if you will. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
