Hi folks,
Am 25.09.2010 um 13:30 schrieb James Lee:
On 25/09/10, 12:05:24, Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> wrote
regarding
Re: [csw-maintainers] An idea for a shared libraries policy:
This is an idea for packaging of shared libraries which
simplifies the
life cycle of a shared library, from the introduction to the
removal
from the catalog.
http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2009-October/009960.html
Having read the referenced message I think that you agree with
Maciej's
proposal. I'm I right?
Maciej agrees with my old idea although it was pooh-poohed at the
time.
Who dared pooh-pooh you?
http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2009-October/
009992.html
No no no no... Don't you put the blame on me for that one! ;-)
I like (and liked) the idea, but raised the issue that there
may be multiple non-version-resembling shared libs from one
package. Apart from that I like it. And after one more year
of packaging experience I would say my doubts from that time
have not been correct. Lots of complicated multi-version-
modulation-libs would benefit from it, like
libicu
libcurl
libneon
which immediately come to my mind.
Best regards
-- Dago
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
.:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
