On 28/09/10, 10:05:08, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote regarding Re: [csw-maintainers] An idea for a shared libraries policy:
> > These packages are only used as dependencies so the naming doesn't > > have > > to be appealing. No user should need to directly install a run time. > > They should even be in the list offered to users, only the top level > > names should be, like jpeg, python. > I guess you mean "They should NOT even be...". Very true. Correct. Sorry, brain and fingers not connected. > This would > solve one other issue: The JRE can be thought of as a runtime, which > we can not deliver right now as it is not "bundled" with another > Java-package that uses it. "Hiding" some packages from pkg-get/pkgutil > would solve this. Yes, it's a presentation thing. Like the pkginfo flag CATEGORY: system|application. James. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
