On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Geoff Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > From my experiences with trying to keep multiple versions of RT 2.x and 3.x > alive over the past 8 years, I can say with some authority that RT (and it's > tight dependency HTML::Mason) is incredibly finicky about the explicit Perl > module versions that it uses. This makes it a nightmare for the end-user > sysadmin and I would imagine for the CSW maintainers who want to keep things > current. For this reason, the servers on which RT ran eventually NEVER got > CSW package updates because the module upgrades would break RT on a regular > basis if given a chance.
This is exactly what I've heard as well. I think my "fix" for RT would do no harm to RT (which probably doesn't work anyway) and it's one less dep to Apache 1. Long term we should provide a complete collection of deps for RT or maybe a VM image? We need a new RT maintainer though. /peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
