Excerpts from Peter FELECAN's message of Fri Nov 19 04:45:53 -0500 2010: > vision should matter also. Hence the community concept vs. a sort of > autocratic organization. Let that last one for Fortune 500 entities.
I know this wasargued against the time someone put it forward , but I think the release manager should be a) an elected position and b) a position that is mutually exclusive from any board position. It may make sense to have the election for the release manager straddle/overlap the board election so that each release manager would see two boards and vice versa. As long as the elected person enforces the policies as laid out, and works to improve or clarify them where necessary, there is no reason this wouldn't work. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
