On 11/19/10, Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> wrote: > Philip Brown <[email protected]> writes: >... >> So let me share more detail of my experience, and how that benefits my >> position of release manager. > > Well, nobody said that your contribution [as release manager] to the > community is not > valuable.
Choosing the option of "no human release manager", is saying exactly that. (if one presumes that people are choosing that option, with the assumption that quality of packages will not suffer as a result) It would in some ways bother me more, if a majority of maintainers voted for "no human release manager", and believed in their hearts, "yes, quality of packages WILL suffer, but I dont care, i just want life easier for myself" If the majority of voting members no longer care about package quality as paramount importance, that would be a sign that opencsw has become an organization I would no longer wish to be a part of, or even use products from. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
