On 11/24/10, Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> wrote: > > Use only suffixes from a limited and well defined set, such as {gcc}. > But, is there other use case for this? If this is the only use case, > we can use a "-g" suffix, e.g., CSWlibfoo1-g >
we have an existing de-facto standard to add (*gcc) to package names, in multiple use cases. I think for clarity, we should continue our standard behaviour there rather than attempting to "save" 3 chars. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
