Hi, Am 24.11.2010 um 17:47 schrieb Philip Brown: > On 11/24/10, Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Use only suffixes from a limited and well defined set, such as {gcc}. >> But, is there other use case for this? If this is the only use case, >> we can use a "-g" suffix, e.g., CSWlibfoo1-g > > we have an existing de-facto standard to add (*gcc) to package names, > in multiple use cases. I think for clarity, we should continue our > standard behaviour there rather than attempting to "save" 3 chars.
To enhance clarity I suggest adding -gcc and _gcc instead just concatenation which is also more homogenous to the new module naming (like CSWpm-* for modules). Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
