Philip Brown <[email protected]> writes: > This is what I mean by "[something that works in the real world]". > In the "Real World", almost no maintainer asks someone else for a > review before releasing their package. > > So your, and Peter's proposal, will effectively result in packages > getting directly released without any 3rd party review, for pretty > much all future packages.
you still didn't take into account the other distribution models, as I suggested: "[...]Look at the other distributions models and you'll see that there is not a serious one having an *unique* person doing discretionary release management.[...]" this thread is not only about human release management but also about how that role is accomplished: discretionarily. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
