Philip Brown <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Would you consider same priorities a bug or a feature? >> >> Definitely a feature! You example shows it clearly. >> > > How is it a feature? > what if the install order is effectively random? how is that a benefit > to the user?
You should remember the context, as described by Dag. In my reading, it's about packages having declared alternatives with the same priority and the issue of keeping the first installed alternative when installing, later, other alternatives, with the same priority. >>If we implement same priority alternatives and the order of installation >>is rendered persistent > > how can we possibly guarantee order of installation? > That would seem to be up to the user. Still thinking that this can be a feature, I'll let Dag arguing with you about what and how. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
